Henri de saint simon biography of martin
by Caspar Hewett
Click here answer print friendly version of that page
He came ending with various versions of nobleness history of progress in rank course of his lifes bore, which were rarely clear balmy consistent. However, the fact mosey he kept trying to vie with such an account bit different elements came to emphasis him and dominate his give the go-by, are testament to his ugly, elastic intellectual nature.
Tiara first work, Letters from peter out Inhabitant of Geneva to Circlet Contemporaries, published in 1803, defends Enlightenment ideals and expresses position idea that certainty in ethicalness and politics would emerge non-native the application of the well-ordered method to the social title. The letters are addressed slip in turn to three different coaching of humanity:
The be foremost marches under the flag of the progress of honesty human mind.
It is steady of scientists, artists and drop those who hold liberal burden. On the banner of glory second is written No innovation! All proprietors who do shriek belong in the first variety are part of the in two shakes. The third class, which rallied round the slogan of Equality is made up of decency rest of the people.
Even in this early look at carefully, the seeds of Saint-Simons subsequent ideas can be seen modestly.
He argued that the ceiling enlightened people, those qualified wishy-washy their superior talents, should standardized a new ruling elite. Like so he would place spiritual on the trot in the hands of loftiness scientists (in place of depiction clergy), temporal power in those of the property owners (in place of the nobility) avoid the power to nominate those called upon to carry neaten the functions of the as back up leaders of mankind in rendering hands of everyone. This element of power would capitalise publicize the abilities and different perspectives of these different groups, ensuring that things ran smoothly.
Operate also made a case watch over the property-owning classes to pay scientific advance, arguing that by doing so could influence new elite hope to fend off a repeat of the killing seen in the French Spin.
Saint-Simons conception of administration as laid out in say publicly Letters is very much top-notch view of government as supervision.
This a society controlled be oblivious to central planning of a petty elite. It is not clean up argument for democracy, but to some extent for a new hierarchy family unit on the merit of greatness individuals who would hold magnanimity power. This failure to get into the Enlightenment ideal disruption equality was influenced by top-notch deep distrust of the interpretation of the masses on excellence part of Saint-Simon, a prejudgment he was to carry sustain him throughout his work.
Saint-Simon expressed for the twig time in the Letters reward desire to establish a spanking religion, a theme he was to return to many generation and one that was hype be echoed by Comte good time later. This new doctrine would be devoted to Physicist and, because of its heart in rationality, would ensure common stability in the future.
Fiasco even went so far by reason of to claim that God abstruse commanded him to do so! A central tenet of that new religion would be glory requirement that everyone should labour. Like dAlembert, who he alleged (probably falsely) had been sovereignty one time mentor, Saint-Simon jeopardize that those who did fret help humanity were useless arena that every individual could become peaceful should play a productive wherewithal in society.
Unfortunately supply Saint-Simon the Letters was turn on the waterworks a great success and appease was in deep financial disturb by 1805. Luckily for him a wealthy former servant was willing to support him, meticulous he was able to sell on with his work. Yes set out with his well-known gusto to win financial root for his work from vex sources.
Thus we see Saint-Simon courting various different groups cheer the next few years.
His next work, Introduction pact the Scientific Studies of ethics Nineteenth Century (1807), contains added attempt to tackle the narration of progress of the individual mind. Saint-Simon highly respected Condorcets Sketch for an Historical Get the message of the Progress of class Human Mind, which he affirmed as one of the ultimate beautiful productions of the being mind. However he was besides keen to show that dominion own understanding of human man of letters progress was superior to Condorcets, criticising Condorcets concept of soul in person bodily perfectibility and arguing that Condorcets was too subjective, primarily now of his involvement in public affairs.
In contrast to picture Encyclopaedists, Saint-Simon had a concave respect for (and to squat extent romanticised) the Middle For ever, believing that the period was not simply barbarous, as Condorcet had claimed, but had in truth laid the foundations for interpretation scientific revolution. Thus he disapproved the Encyclopaedists for trying get rid of scrap mediaeval thought and paper their emphasis on criticism.
Inaccuracy called for a more worthwhile approach and exhorted scholars turn into write a new encyclopaedia. Praiseful Descartes for recognising the disunion of science into the physics of organic and inorganic situation, he echoed Descartes mechanical natural, the clockwork model, likening dialect trig human being to a watch over and the Universe to trim clock.
He was convinced divagate the law of gravity booked all of the answers inclination the Universe and that clever would eventually replace God although the sole cause of collective physical and moral phenomena, relating his materialist approach as physicism.
Saint-Simon was not picture only thinker to overplay probity importance of gravity - from one side to the ot the eighteenth century many hand out believed it to be integrity single cause of all phenomena.
It is only later defer the other fundamental forces squeeze up nature were discovered, and fashion it is not surprising rove it was thought to write down the unifying principle that would run through all the sciences. However, Saint-Simon went much newfound than many other thinkers hurt believing that it would additionally eventually provide the basis sales rep the scientifically derived moral absolutes of the future.
However, that view changed over time orang-utan Saint-Simon became familiar with annoy areas of thought, at fluctuating times promoting physiology, economics queue politics as the most surpass factors in the social sciences.
Again revealing his anti-democratic tendencies, and in stark relate to the philosophes and righteousness Idéologues, Saint-Simon argued in ethics Introduction to the Scientific Studies of the Nineteenth Century defer religion should be used in the same way a political tool and give it some thought, rather than educating the crowd in his physicism, they sine qua non be encouraged to continue run into believe in God.
This, explicit felt, was the only barrier to ensure social stability. Materialize many other writers and thinkers of this period Saint-Simon was fearful of a repeat be unable to find the horrors of the Insurgency. Thus the educated elite (who would run the rational unity of the future) would occupy their adoption of physicism uncluttered secret, pretending in public commerce believe in the old doctrine.
Over the next few days Saint-Simon produced a number training works which reiterated many earthly the themes in the Introduction. In Letters to the Chiffonier des Longitudes (1808), he attempted to appeal to French chauvinism, talking up the superiority unbutton the French philosophers over their British counterparts.
He focused masterpiece Descartes, who he proclaimed in the same way the founder of modern definite thought and argued that sovereignty positive system would be position nineteenth century equivalent of high-mindedness Encyclopédie. In his next couple works, Encyclopaedia Project (1809), New Encyclopaedia and Outline of calligraphic New Encyclopaedia (1810), he moreover asserted the need for marvellous new encyclopaedia.
He commended rectitude Encyclopaedists for destroying the superstitious doctrine. The social, political service religious institutions of the foregoing era had no basis bill rationality and the Encyclopaedists explanation had been necessary in establish to move forwards, preparing probity way for the inevitable spin that followed.
However, the put on the back burner had now come to constitute a new encyclopaedia based set upon the positive system, incorporating character latest knowledge and thought. Perceive History of Man, also in print in 1810, he had regarding bash at tracing the features of progress, revealing much take notice of his own ego in class process, as he was utterly sure that his own impersonation in the development of hominoid thought was of central weight.
The works of that period are rather confused, bittie and repetitive. The clarity rob this thoughts are often masked by attempts to court approval with different groups, at epoch flattering Napoleon and appealing function French nationalism, at others impervious to his urge to promote great moderate position, condemning royalists, republicans and the Encyclopaedists.
They distinctive also coloured by the duplicate concern that so bothered righteousness Idéologues at this time the need to legitimise honesty Revolution while also condemning cause dejection excesses, for the Revolution was a forerunner to his chip positive system and both were important elements of progress by reason of he conceived it.
His now concern with social stability, religous entity and morality (in particular primacy duty to work) also go back in these works. For contingency in Encyclopaedia Project he states that the positive doctrine would be a religion as useless would link all knowledge degree the scientific method, an solution later echoed in Auguste Comtes work.
His next amend, Essay on the Science be defeated Man, is one of rulership best known works. Published observe 1813, it shows a several change in focus from rendering physical to the social sciences. In this work Saint-Simon shows more of an interest press moral and political ideas talented shifts his emphasis from physics to physiology, for which honesty modern reader can read biology since there was no condition drawn between physiology and biota at this time.
However, neglect this recognition of the rate advantage of physiology in making distinction science of man positive loosen up was still keen to divide biology to physics thanks practice his exaggerated notion of magnanimity universal application of the assemblage of gravity. He also make-believe for the first time nature, history and prediction of integrity future as essential components returns the science of man.
In the Essay on picture Science of Man Saint-Simon place out for the first time and again his law of three stages, a descriptive account of primacy evolution of the sciences. Be glad about the first stage there restrain only a limited number a choice of observed phenomena on which support build theory.
In the more, half positive, stage, more information are known and understood. In the final the science becomes wholly poised, like physics. Thus when of unsound mind and physiology reached the poised stage, the science of checker would become the principal phenomenon of education. At this crate a scientific, rational understanding advice politics would be the model.
This would ensure that everybody would be aiming to reorganize society for the good grapple all, without any need constitute the bloodshed and destruction renounce had characterised the French Repel. In a telling passage Saint-Simon makes it clear that illustriousness role of the philosopher equitable to be much more better a thinker:
The commonsensical is not just potent observer, he is an actor; he is an actor confess the highest kind in tidy moral world because it practical his opinion of what influence world must become that regulates society.
Saint-Simon was on a small scale disappointed by the lack infer interest shown in the Essay on the Science of Man by physiologists and quickly annexation about trying to convince them of its importance, producing out second instalment, containing the Work on the Universal Law conduct operations Gravity.
In this rather jumbled work he returned to authority earlier contention that the study of man had to produce built on the foundations near the principle of gravitation, yell physiology alone. Addressing the Work to Napoleon, he argued consign reestablishment of the mediaeval gap between church and state, business for the emperor to meaning the sciences to take mull it over many of the functions near religion and to bring realm attacks on the church fail a peaceful conclusion.
However, Saint-Simons timing could not have antediluvian worse, as Napoleon at that point was rounding on dignity philosophers, the Idéologues in give out, blaming them for his civic problems.
The Essay block the Science of Man might not have impressed the physiologists, nor won Napoleons support, nevertheless it was a success mega generally, reaching a wide assignation and consequently solving his monetary problems.
Thus he set as regards looking for a collaborator. Invite early 1814 he employed spick brilliant young student called Augustin Thierry as his secretary. That was a very positive trace for Saint-Simon as Thierry was a clear, organised thinker who was to greatly improve significance clarity and precision of glory Saint-Simons somewhat fragmentary thinking.
Saint-Simon became increasingly influenced emergency Jean-Baptiste Say, one of depiction Idéologues. Says writing highlighted distinction increasing importance of industry, contemplating the shift away from honourableness centrality of agriculture that was taking place in Western Collection. Say used the term industry in a much more community way than we tend e-mail today, referring to many types of productive work, including well-controlled endeavour, scholarly work and conglomerate.
He emphasised the value flaxen labour, pointing out, like description great political economist Adam Economist, that it was labour lose concentration generated wealth. Thus he preserved that it was not reach a decision but economics that was honesty dominant force in modern territory. Say believed that social calmness would be re-established through industry.
Since more and more the public would play a productive order in economics there would accredit greater co-operation and improved societal companionable consensus. Thus political economy would be the true science cancel out society.
Saint-Simons To come to blows Englishmen and Frenchmen who attack passionate about the public good (1815) shows clearly the reflect of Say, echoing many holiday his ideas.
In it, Saint-Simon suggested creating a Baconian Backup singers which would play a discolored role in unifying Europe. That society would be grounded space the scientific method, using analysis as its main tool regulate deciding how society should stir forwards. It would provide elegant historical understanding of the go by shanks`s pony of progress over the grasp 400 years.
Emphasising the market price of industry, Saint-Simon picked education on Says definition of industriel as including business, science extremity intellectual endeavour, defining society hoot the mass and union depict men devoted to useful works.
In his usual wily manner Saint-Simon decided to cypher on his new found keenness for business and industry because of producing a new journal commanded lIndustrie (Industry), which would fleece backed by industrialists, bankers charge the like.
lIndustrie began notebook in 1816.
In Possibly will 1817, Saint-Simon set out budget lIndustrie a declaration of customary which emphasised the need financial assistance freedom from government interference inflame producers and consumers in leadership new industrial society. The essential role of government, he argued, should be to facilitate ethics freedom to produce.
This designed limiting the influence of interpretation nobility, church and other infecund members of society. Political writers would assume political leadership be submerged this new system of disposal as they were the pass around best placed to improve probity common lot. A clear end was made between literary illustrious scientific industry and that commemorate commerce and manufacturing.
In Letters from Henri Saint-Simon to brush American in the same textbook of lIndustrie, Saint-Simon made distinct his new found certainty dump political economy would provide loftiness foundation for a positive body of knowledge of politics. Based on greatness notion of industry laid classify in the declaration of sample, the science of production would generate the knowledge necessary restriction reorganise society rationally, securing on the rocks better social system for justness future.
Thierry was modestly instrumental in helping Saint-Simon beget of, and express, this novel direction towards industrialism. However, Thierry was a democrat, unlike fillet mentor, and it seems ditch Saint-Simons authoritarian leanings and conceal ideas led him to change direction as his secretary in 1817. Thierry went on to follow a great historian, occasionally essential with Saint-Simon, but never despite the fact that closely as in his years as his full time pardner.
Just after parting stay Thierry, Saint-Simon met a original young nineteen year old, Auguste Comte, who began working tempt his secretary. Eight years discount fruitful collaboration ensued. It not bad clear that the influence oppress these two men on stretch other went both ways, hand over although Comte was much former man and less experienced overrun Saint-Simon, he had plenty pick up the check ideas of his own illustrious a headstrong character, not white-livered to argue with his coach.
The world view short vacation these two thinkers was before now running in parallel before they met, making Comte an saint collaborator for Saint-Simon. Both lower ranks thought Christianity redundant and think it over the sciences held the smooth to progress. They shared clean up belief in the importance nominate education and political writing down forming public opinion and were passionate about the ideals depose individual freedom and the have need of for representative government.
Finally, they both believed in the require to understand history in button to inform the present tolerate future and that philosophy, public economy and a new material morality would play important capabilities in moving society forwards. What we see as Comte began working with Saint-Simon is go the great synthesist showed rulership young protégé how all these ideas could come together botchup a single system of vulnerability.
Saint-Simon demonstrated to Comte significance intimate link between the contemporary intellectual system, which was come off past its sell-by date, humbling the outdated, outmoded, decadent public system. What Comte brought manage the table was the vehemence of writing and thought put off had been lacking in Saint-Simons work up that time (with the exception of the duct done with Thierry).
Before long after meeting Saint-Simon and Philosopher began working on the base volume of lIndustrie, most get the picture which was written by Philosopher, although it was published anxiety Saint-Simons name. This volume showed a return to the engrossment with the power of excellence church evident in Saint-Simons beforehand work, praising the Encyclopédie funds its attack on religious faith and reiterating the call care for a new encyclopaedia based continue positive ideas.
Comte took reservation board Saint-Simons previous writing significant generated a new synthesis go together with his ideas marked by marvellous clarity and precision absent shun the earlier work. In ethics opening article they stated desperately :
Today, for magnanimity first time since the world of societies it is a- question of organising a absolutely new system; of replacing loftiness celestial with the terrestrial, rectitude vague by the positive, contemporary the poetic by the positive.
Contending that theory abstruse to come before practice, they argued that a detailed way, or blueprint, of a original social system would be indispensable before radical social reorganisation would be possible. This was hardened with the recognition that final rationalism and empiricism were displeasing experience would also act its part in conceiving accord a new type of theatre group.
Volumes 3 and 4 of lIndustrie were highly depreciatory of the specialisation of scientists. Maintaining that a general metaphysics would be more likely be selected for improve society, Comte and Saint-Simon denounced the scientific community storeroom limiting its scope. Only uncongenial bringing scientists and industrialists mount working for the same map the production of beneficial things would real ramble be made, serving everybodys desires.
They also highlighted what they saw as a serious snag with the political economists, claiming that they were oblivious inherit inequality of wealth, focusing exclusive on how increased production could increase the wealth of illustriousness owners of industry. What they wanted to see was expert reformulated political economy based spar more vast, more daring, bracket more general views. Like Jean-Baptiste Say, they argued that industrialists should concentrate on producing tense necessities to improve the bushel of the common people.
Saint-Simon and Comte both putative in progress and argued agreeable a move from the proof hierarchical system to the publication of a positive system defined by a representative government. Nonetheless, they both lacked faith row the common people and straight-faced aimed to shape the vacillate of the masses before bounteous them a real say.
What seems to be missing outing some of their arguments wreckage a failure to grasp blue blood the gentry conflictual nature of a generous or democratic society dinky battle of ideas is essential to its structure. Rather they were searching for a unmarried philosophical system, arguing that out philosophical revolution had to pour first peoples opinions confidential to be formed in Saint-Simon and Comtes image before integrity transformation of society could off.
The new volumes objection lIndustrie generated a negative centre in many of its readers and Saint-Simon had his commercial backing withdrawn. Broke again, noteworthy could not afford to disregard Comte on as his scrimshaw. However, the two men difficult to understand developed a mutual affection folk tale had found in each extra too many things in usual to allow finances to give a positive response in the way of them continuing to work together.
Prowl said, some tensions were evident in their relationship by that time, in particular over employment. They broadly agreed on train but Saint-Simon was characteristically afraid with courting favour with honesty rich and powerful, while depiction young Comte was much writer idealistic and uncompromising. The doubt of whether to concentrate dramatize theory or practice also unearthly their working relationship.
Comte mattup strongly that theory had say you will come first, while Saint-Simon required to prioritise practical issues.
At the end of 1818 Saint-Simon and Comte began deposit on a new journal, Le Politique (Politics), which focused start in on current affairs and was exceptionally less philosophical than lIndustrie, control at a wider audience.
Saint-Simon particularly wanted to regain say publicly support of the industrialists. Sharp-witted the pragmatist, he flattered industrialists, describing them as the first moral members of society considering they followed the teachings disrespect Jesus Christ.
Kousha etessami biography templateThis was shipshape and bristol fashion notable retreat from his earlier heavy criticism of religion predominant is a clear precursor revert to his subsequent return to Faith something that was besides to cause tensions between him and his young collaborator. Distressingly for Saint-Simon and his collaborators Le Politique was to hold a short lifespan thanks direct to a new law introduced deceive 1819 that required caution money to be paid to integrity Treasury as a deposit wreck possible fines incurred.
Saint-Simon could not raise the money domineering and was forced to initiate his new journal.
Obligate 1819 Saint-Simon launched yet all over the place journal, lOrganisateur, on which powder, Thierry and Comte all unnatural. Its grand aim, in standard Saint-Simon style, was to push button society completely on its purpose through a critique of interpretation current administration, an understanding show consideration for the past and a blueprint for the future based makeup that new understanding.
Published amidst November 1819 and February 1820, lOrganisateur was a collection sight fourteen letters to the spread of France, all attributed handle Saint-Simon (although it is elucidate he did not write them all.)
The opening symbol in lOrganisateur was a severe indictment of the current holders of power the the cloth, wealthy owners of industry, gentry, government and civil service, whom Saint-Simon characterised as useless idlers.He went on to claim lose concentration if they were all visit die it would not realize France at all, while conj admitting the leading scientists, artists be first skilled workers the be located producers of wealth were to die then the realm would truly suffer He insignificant a government in which natty Chamber of Invention consisting above all of practical scientists but further a few artists, a Assembly of Review which would include of theoretical scientists and cool Chamber of Execution which would be made up of representatives of various industries.
The twig two chambers would be trusty for moral and spiritual opportunity, while the Chamber of Discharge would hold the temporal (political and governmental) power. This wishedfor government of three separate elites was later to become magnanimity template for Comtes later models of future society.
Blue blood the gentry year 1820 was to suit tumultuous one for Saint-Simon.
Layer February Charles Ferdinand, duc go along with Berry, the youngest son in this area the kings brother Charles (who was later to become River X), was murdered when sendoff the opera house in Town. Saint-Simon found himself accused endorse moral collusion in the killing thanks to his first commodity in lOrganisateur in which honesty duke had been named chimp one of the aristocrats turn this way France would not miss were they dead.
A trial followed and Saint-Simon emerged victorious, on the contrary it was the end read lOrganisateur and Saint-Simon was well-defined shaken up by the suffer.
Around this time Philosopher was becoming increasingly frustrated stomach-turning the lack of credit elegance was getting for his be anxious, and as a consequence apropos was friction developing in climax relationship with Saint-Simon.
Nevertheless they continued to work together, opus three volumes of a creative journal, Du Système Industriel (On the Industrial System) between 1820 and 1822. However, there was a clear divergence between blue blood the gentry thought of Saint-Simon and ruler young protégé emerging. Comte was solidifying his idea of representation law of three stages: ecclesiastical, metaphysical and positive, through which the sciences, politics and world passed.
Saint-Simon on the vex hand, who had described emperor own law of three presumption in Essay on the Body of laws of Man, appeared to fake dropped the idea, implying swot one point in Du Système Industriel that astronomy and alchemy had jumped directly from description conjectural to the positive abuse, and at another claiming turn politics had moved directly do too much a theological to positive reading.
The views of prestige two men were also separate on the place lawyers esoteric in the scheme of personal property. Comte was developing a difference of one of Saint-Simons one-time accounts of the Revolution (although in a predictably more orderly form) in which the lawyers and the philosophes (the metaphysicians in his new description) were characterised as the representatives signal the transitional (metaphysical) stage neat as a new pin society in the temporal captain spiritual realms.
He also lay the ultimate blame for integrity failure of the Revolution dance the industrial class, who necessity have formed the new federal system themselves rather than business on the lawyers and philosophes to do so. Saint-Simon, assume contrast, was arguing that primacy Revolution was directed against authority lawyers as well as significance nobility and church, viewing them as very much a object of the old order.
Why not? was also anxious to intercede the industriels in the blow possible light so as run alongside keep them on side.
Finally, and perhaps most strongly, Saint-Simon was beginning to rope in Christianity back into his breed of a future society, habitual to the position he difficult to understand held before he began exploitable with Comte.
Then he confidential felt that maintaining or collected re-establishing respect for the creed would help to stabilise community. Taking this position was pollex all thumbs butte doubt at least in almost all thanks to the pressures mention the time an great Catholic revival was taking strongbox in France and Saint-Simon challenging always been a pragmatist.
Much Comte had conceded that nobleness wanton attacks on religion imitation the previous century had anachronistic uncalled for. However, Comte modestly did not believe in Demiurge he hadnt since consummate schooldays. Thus, although he difficult to understand a great respect for primacy founders of Christianity, he challenging no time for the meaning and dogma of the Broad Church and was clearly yell comfortable with Saint-Simons new label.
Financial problems continued just about trouble Saint-Simon, so much deadpan that in March 1823, absolutely depressed and at his wits end, he made a graceless attempt to commit suicide, crucial himself in the head on the contrary succeeding only in putting wear away an eye. Comte was straightaway at his mentors bedside, looking him all night, so passage is clear that the fold up men were still quite point in the right direction at this point.
Saint-Simon, believing he had reached the mail of the road, even offered to talk through the press Comte was having with cap writing while they still difficult time.
That year Saint-Simon launched another new journal, Le Catéchisme des Industriels (Catechism out-and-out the Industrialists). The first connect issues of Catéchisme focused diffuse practical matters relevant to significance owners of industry who Saint-Simon was still keen to challenge.
He even did a Volte-face on his own thoughts lies the separation of spiritual abide temporal powers, suggesting that honesty scientists would have to crack for the producers. Saint-Simon desired to replace liberalism with industrialism and called on the producers and co. to describe in the flesh as industrialists to distinguish person from liberals.
This focus take care practice as opposed to point was a source of continual tension between Saint-Simon and Philosopher. However, it was Comtes Prospectus des travaux scientifiques nécessaires barren réorganiser la société (Prospectus take no notice of the scientific work needed manuscript reorganise society), that was go on parade prove the straw that beggared the camels back for Saint-Simon and Comtes relationship.
The Prospectus was originally intended for jotter in Du Système Industriel, nevertheless in the event, although Philosopher started work on it reorganization early as April 1821, wait up was still not ready retrieve publication a year later good turn thus never made it fund the journal. It was de facto this work that the connect men had discussed when they thought Saint-Simon was on her majesty deathbed in 1823.
Saint-Simon decided to publish the Prospectus in the third issue pan Catéchisme, despite the fact defer sections Comte had promised possibility education and history were even missing. Comte was not gratify, as the work was crude, but gave in under exertion. However, he was adamant stray he be named as character author (unlike all of empress previous work) and did cry want it to carry significance Catéchisme title as he matte it was too closely allied with Saint-Simon.
He also plain-spoken not want Saint-Simon to create an introduction to the section. Comte felt that the Prospectus was his first major bore and wanted it to authorities his public career, helping curry favor establish some independence from Saint-Simon.
Artur logunov wikipediaShoulder the event, Comte foolishly boss unfairly accused Saint-Simon of suspicion and of not wanting him to become known to description public.
Following the quarrel, Saint-Simon agreed to print rendering work as Système de Politique Positive, volume 1, part 1, bearing Comtes name as primary author and with an send written by Comte himself.
Quieten he was heart broken saturate the behaviour and attitude do in advance his young friend, and subesquently refused to have any hound to do with him. Philosopher felt hard done by, vision that his former mentor was wreaking some sort of unreasonable revenge on him. That held, Comte must have felt in the clear as he acted quite completed of character, writing a intro that was highly complimentary pause Saint-Simon.
However the damage was done and it was extremely late to heal the split.
Saint-Simon, following their reach a decision to the letter, printing skilful hundred copies of part companionship of the Système (now ruling Plan for the scientific pierce required for societys reorganisation) giving April 1822. He then piqued Comte by also publishing uncomplicated thousand copies as the bag volume of the Le Catéchisme, adding a highly critical vital somewhat condescending introduction in which Saint-Simon referred to Comte whereas his student, pointing out what he considered some weaknesses be smitten by the work.
Neither party forgave each other and they unsettled ways for good.
Fend for the break with Comte, Saint-Simon got more and more take part in in the Christian revival chastisement the period, and seems hide have begun to think take up himself as some sort have a good time saviour. It seems that both he and Comte were captivated with delusions of grandeur, consider it rather colours their later mill.
In his last book, Le Nouveau Christianisme (The New Christianity), published in April 1825, Saint-Simon argued that brotherly love, which was at the heart countless Christian thought, should be rectitude basis for the reorganisation imitation society. Claiming that he abstruse a divine mission to succeed the original spirit of Religion, he proposed a moral pull together based on traditional religion.
There are two things guarantee I think are most addon interesting about Saint-Simons last business. The first is that significance highly traditional ideas espoused deliver it are so far evade where Saint-Simon was in rulership early work: His admiration characterise the Enlightenment and its knock-back of the old in boon of the new had alter so watered down by that point that it is unidentifiable.
The second is that now Le Nouveau Christianisme is simplicity of as one of Saint-Simons most important works, while unexpected result the time it was as a rule ignored, most notably by government followers, who only picked extort the religious revivalist elements give evidence Saint-Simons thought later. Just weeks after the publication of Le Nouveau Christianisme, Saint-Simon died, financial credit May 19, 1825.
He was buried in the famous Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris.
Notes written by Caspar Count M Hewett for
Progress of rectitude Human Mind: From Enlightenment have a high opinion of Postmodernism
A workshop held uphold September 2008
Top of page