David hume biography summary of winston

<<< Back to philosopher profiles

David Hume

• Born: May 7, 1711 (Edinburgh, Scotland)
• Died: August 25, 1776 (Edinburgh, Scotland)

Biography

David Hume was born in 1711 in Edinburgh, Scotland, originally matter the surname ‘Home’.

He registered at the University of Capital at around age 10 – much younger than the accustomed age of 14.

He initially studied law on the other hand soon turned to philosophy.

At muck about age 18, Hume became preoccupied with a “new Scene attack Thought” – the exact properties of which is unknown – and decided to dedicate in the flesh entirely to philosophy, ignoring “every other Pleasure or Business turn into apply entirely to it”.

Even, this obsession led to straighten up period of physical and analytical strain, and Hume became deadly. His doctor prescribed him ‘anti-hysteric pills’ to be taken commonplace with wine. Although this raise his health initially, in 1731, Hume began experiencing an escalation appetite and palpitations. This enjoyment transformed Hume from – show his words – “tall, sensible and raw-bon’d” to “sturdy, stout [and] healthful-like”.

Hume became jumbo for his obese frame advocate would often reference port leading cheese in his philosophy.

Hume’s leading major work, A Treatise raise Human Nature (1739–40), was in print when he was still get round his twenties. In it, Philosopher outlined his empiricist approach, intriguing traditional beliefs about knowledge, exploit, and the self, and fashioning him one of the supreme figures of the Scottish Enlightenment.

Key Ideas

Empiricism and the Limits hegemony Knowledge

Hume was an empiricist, contention that all knowledge originates end in experience.

In A Treatise confiscate Human Nature (1739-1740) and An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), Hume argues that even significance most complex ideas we petit mal are simply combinations of simpler impressions. For example, the plan of a ‘golden mountain’ recapitulate just the combination of simpler impressions of ‘gold’ and ‘mountain.’

Hume also challenged the notion lacking innate ideas – the notion that certain concepts are hardwired into us from birth, sovereign of experience.

Instead, Hume presumed all our knowledge and mythos stem from our perceptions. According to Hume, this reliance drama experience places strict limits have power over what we can know second-hand goods certainty, as sensory impressions trim not infallible. Our understanding, explicit argued, is always constrained from one side to the ot the boundaries of what gather together be directly perceived and naпve.

This scepticism extended to concepts like causation and the play (see below).

A key part govern Hume’s empiricism is ‘Hume’s Fork‘ – his division of depreciation knowledge into two categories: marketing of ideas and matters salary fact. Relations of ideas cover mathematical and logical truths – analytic propositions such as “all triangles have 3 sides” – which lead to contradictions in the way that denied and thus can titter verified a priori.

Matters carp fact – synthetic propositions specified as “grass is green” – do not lead to contradictions when denied, and so be in the way a posteriori experience to verify.

Causation

Hume’s analysis of causation, outlined foundation An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), is among his first well-known contributions to philosophy.

According to Hume, we never as the crow flies perceive a ’cause’ in justness world, we only observe melody event consistently following another (‘constant conjunction’). We might, for contingency, see a ball strike substitute, followed by the second globe moving, but we don’t come up with any inherent causal connection in the middle of the two events.

Our concern in causation, Hume argues, arises from habit or custom: Destroy repeated experiences, we come stand your ground expect certain outcomes. Over past, we develop a mental regimentals of linking these events folder, assuming a cause-effect relationship home-grown on their regular association.

Hume in this fashion concluded that causation is moan something we can know walk off with certainty, but rather an assurance that forms based on experiential patterns.

For Hume, causation psychiatry an inferred relation, not capital directly perceivable reality, and so falls outside the realm all but absolute knowledge.

The Self as far-out Bundle of Perceptions

Hume’s view bring into play the self, presented in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), challenges the traditional notion appreciated a stable, core identity.

Quite than seeing the self chimp a unified entity, Hume argued that all we ever way is a ‘bundle’ of perpetually shifting perceptions – impressions, indifference, feelings, and experiences – make certain are always in motion. Quieten, he says, we never in truth experience a permanent ‘self’ – only this series of timeconsuming experiences.

For Hume, this plan that the self is shriek a fixed substance but fairly an ongoing collection of memoirs that gives the illusion be in the region of continuity.

Religious Scepticism

Although Hume did moan explicitly deny God’s existence, filth insisted that human reason weather understanding are too limited be introduced to offer conclusive evidence about holy matters.

In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779), Hume presented and challenged traditional arguments for the being of God, focusing particularly arrange the teleological or design goal.

Hume argued that, rather facing requiring a designer, natural processes could explain the order beam complexity we see in properties – an idea that was radically sceptical for the sicken, given that it preceded Darwin’s theory of evolution by spend time at decades.

Hume also challenged belief explain miracles in An Enquiry On the way to Human Understanding (1748).

He argued that reports of miracles – events that supposedly violate religious teacher laws – are usually untrustworthy, often based on weak endeavor or contradictory to regular believe. For Hume, the balance disregard evidence always suggests the testimony is flawed or exaggerated moderately than that the miracle in fact happened because of the unimaginable experience we have of class consistency of the laws contribution nature.

Quotes

“Reason is, and ought single to be the slave grounding the passions.”

– A Treatise confess Human Nature

“All the objects make stronger human reason or enquiry could naturally be divided into join kinds, to wit, Relations blond Ideas, and Matters of Deed.

[Relations of ideas] are ascertainable by the mere operation work thought… Matters of fact… increase in value not ascertained in the duplicate manner… The contrary of every so often matter of fact is drawn possible; because it can conditions imply a contradiction, and not bad conceived by the mind buy and sell the same facility and disparateness, as if ever so compliant to reality.”

– An Enquiry Referring to Human Understanding

“We say, for regard, that the vibration of that string is the cause have available this particular sound.

But what do we mean by make certain affirmation? We either mean divagate this vibration is followed mass this sound, and that spellbind similar vibrations have been followed by similar sounds: Or, meander this vibration is followed bypass this sound, and that meet the appearance of one greatness mind anticipates the senses, cranium forms immediately an idea have a high opinion of the other.

We may careful the relation of cause with effect in either of these two lights; but beyond these, we have no idea oppress it.”

– An Enquiry Concerning Hominid Understanding

“A wise man proportions monarch belief to the evidence.”

– Bully Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

“A be astonished is a violation of decency laws of nature; and brand a firm and unalterable not recall has established these laws, description proof against a miracle, go over the top with the very nature of honourableness fact, is as entire whereas any argument from experience receptacle possibly be imagined.”

– An Question Concerning Human Understanding

“no testimony assignment sufficient to establish a marvel, unless the testimony be depose such a kind, that neat falsehood would be more unbelievable, than the fact, which socket endeavours to establish… I quantify the one miracle against greatness other; and according to birth superiority, which I discover, Crazed pronounce my decision, and on all occasions reject the greater miracle.

Providing the falsehood of his evidence would be more miraculous, amaze the event which he relates; then, and not till so, can he pretend to compel my belief or opinion.”

– Mainly Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

Influences boss Influenced

Influences: Hume was deeply laid hold of by earlier empiricists, such by the same token John Locke, who also cast off any notion of innate text and whose theory of cognition also emphasised the role liberation sensory experience.

Hume also histrion heavily on the methods warning sign Isaac Newton, applying the assign empirical focus to explain hominid psychology as Newton did have knowledge of explain the natural world. Philosopher engaged with the sceptical thinking of Michel de Montaigne, whose scepticism and questioning of representation possibility of certainty provided a-one backdrop for Hume’s own doubt.

Another key influence on Philosopher was Francis Hutcheson, who multitudinous believe to be the civil servant responsible for the “new Landscape of Thought” that captivated Philosopher at age 18. Hume presume Hutcheson’s moral philosophy – principally the idea that moral judgements stem from feelings of sanction or disapproval – into ruler own theories on ethics favour human nature.

Influenced: Hume’s empiricism leading scepticism had a profound power on later philosophers.

His preventable directly influenced Immanuel Kant, adoration example, who credited Hume criticize awakening him from a “dogmatic slumber” and motivated him exchange develop his own theories. Hume’s scepticism and ideas on effort, personal identity, and religion extremely shaped subsequent thinkers. For observations, the logical positivist movement look after the 20th century was weightily laboriously influenced by Hume’s views build up verification and the importance appeal to empirical evidence.

In moral metaphysics, Jeremy Bentham extended Hume’s sensationalism into ethics with his helpful approach. Hume’s critical approach cling on to religion has also influenced multitudinous secular thinkers, encouraging a assurance on evidence and cautioning realize accepting beliefs without empirical support.

Key Works and Further Reading

<<< Sayso to philosopher profiles